Midwest Academy of International Business Reviewer Form

Evaluation Criteria Poor Average/Good Excellent
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1.  Significance/Relevance: The extent to which the manuscript addresses an important issue/problem/phenomenon in International Business management/strategy
2.  Conceptual Rigor: Treatment of relevant literature, logical reasoning, etc.
3.  Methodological Rigor (select one category):
a) For an Empirical manuscript: The extent to which the manuscript presents an appropriate research design, sample, measures, and analysis.
b) For a Theoretical manuscript: The extent to which the manuscript presents an appropriate model, conceptual framework or proposition to facilitate further research.
4.  Clarity of Presentation and Readability: The extent to which the manuscript is well written (grammar, organization, flow)
5.  Insights Offered and Richness of Implications for Practitioners.
6.  Potential Contribution: The extent to which the manuscript contributes to the knowledge of International Business theory and practice
7.  Member Interest: The extent to which the manuscript is likely to be of interest to Midwest AIB/MBAA members, including managers/practitioners
8.  OVERALL EVALUATION
 
9.  Recommendation to Track Chair:
Definitely
Reject		 Probably
Reject		 Accept only
if space allows		 Accept Definitely
Accept

 

 

Please respond to Question 10 if you rate this manuscript "Definitely Accept"

10. If manuscript is rated "Definitely Accept", is this a Best Paper Candidate?          No           Yes

11.  Feedback to authors (Please provide constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement.  Only information provided in the box below will be shared with the authors):